Hypothesis Class/Hypothesis Family (h) - Python Automation and Machine Learning for ICs - - An Online Book - |
||||||||
Python Automation and Machine Learning for ICs http://www.globalsino.com/ICs/ | ||||||||
Chapter/Index: Introduction | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Appendix | ||||||||
================================================================================= In machine learning, a "hypothesis class" and a "hypothesis family" are related terms that refer to a set of functions or models from which a learning algorithm can select the best one to approximate a target function or make predictions on data. While they are often used interchangeably, there can be slight differences in their interpretations depending on the context.
The choice between using "hypothesis class" or "hypothesis family" may vary depending on the context and the level of generality or specificity you want to convey. The key idea in both cases is that these terms refer to a collection of possible models that a machine learning algorithm considers when trying to find the best model for a particular task. For instance, in the context of linear regression, the hypothesis class might encompass all linear functions, while a hypothesis family could refer specifically to linear functions with different sets of coefficients. Similarly, in the context of decision trees, the hypothesis class could encompass all possible decision trees, whereas a hypothesis family might refer to decision trees with a specific depth or branching factor. Ultimately, the choice of terminology may depend on the level of precision and clarity you want to achieve in describing the space of models under consideration by a machine learning algorithm. Both terms, however, are used to describe the collection of models that a learning algorithm can choose from to make predictions or approximate data. "Hypothesis class" and its variations, such as "predictor class," "model class," "hypothesis family," "predictor family," and "model family," are often used interchangeably in the context of machine learning. These terms all refer to the set of possible candidate models or functions that a learning algorithm considers when trying to make predictions or approximate a target function. The choice of terminology may vary among different sources and individuals, but the underlying concept remains the same. Here's a breakdown of how these terms are related:
In machine learning and statistics, the symbol "h" is commonly used to represent the hypothesis class. The hypothesis class, often denoted as H, refers to the set of all possible hypotheses or models that a machine learning algorithm can consider when trying to learn from data. Each hypothesis within this class represents a potential way to map input data to output predictions. For example, in the context of binary classification, H might represent all possible decision boundaries that can separate data points into two classes. Each hypothesis h in H would then be a specific decision boundary, and the learning algorithm's goal is to find the best hypothesis (h) from this hypothesis class that fits the data. Based on the equation below (see details at page3973): where, L(h^) represents the expected loss of the learned hypothesis ℎ^ on unseen data. L(h*) represents the expected loss of the best possible hypothesis ℎ* in the hypothesis class on unseen data. The term on the righ-hand side is a term related to the complexity of the hypothesis class and the sample size. Here: is the size of the hypothesis class (the number of possible hypotheses). is a parameter representing the confidence level. is the sample size. We can know that if we have a larger hypothesis class, then the bound would be worse. This is generally correct for the following reasons:
However, it's essential to note that a larger hypothesis class isn't inherently "worse." It can be more expressive and capable of capturing complex relationships in the data when there is a sufficient amount of training data available. Additionally, larger hypothesis classes can be advantageous in situations where a complex model is required to model intricate patterns in the data. The key is to strike a balance between model complexity (hypothesis class size), the amount of training data available, and regularization techniques (such as dropout, L1/L2 regularization) to mitigate overfitting. Understanding the trade-offs and making informed choices based on the specific problem and dataset are crucial in achieving good generalization performance. The relationship between the degree of variance and the size of the hypothesis class is: The Python script below demonstrates the concept of a hypothesis class in the context of linear regression. In this example, we'll create a synthetic dataset and consider two different hypothesis classes: one with linear hypotheses and another with polynomial hypotheses. Then, we visualize how these hypotheses fit the data. Code: In the script above:
Here, the "polynomial hypothesis class" is the larger hypothesis class compared to the "linear hypothesis class": Linear Hypothesis Class:
Polynomial Hypothesis Class:
Therefore, the polynomial hypothesis class is larger because it can represent a broader range of functions. ============================================
|
||||||||
================================================================================= | ||||||||
|
||||||||