=================================================================================

Machine learning (ML) for failure analysis in the semiconductor industry involves using algorithms and statistical models to analyze data generated during the manufacturing and testing processes to identify and understand failures in semiconductor devices. This is crucial for ensuring the quality and reliability of semiconductor products. 

Here's how machine learning can be applied in failure analysis within the semiconductor industry: 

• Pattern Recognition: ML algorithms can be trained to recognize patterns in large datasets of semiconductor testing results, such as electrical characteristics, physical properties, and performance metrics. By identifying patterns associated with failure modes, ML models can assist in categorizing and diagnosing failures more accurately and efficiently. 

• Fault Detection and Classification: ML models can be trained to detect and classify different types of faults or defects in semiconductor devices based on various input parameters, such as process parameters, material properties, or test results. This helps in early detection of potential issues and allows for timely corrective actions. 

• Root Cause Analysis: ML techniques, such as clustering and regression analysis, can be used to identify the root causes of failures by correlating various process parameters and environmental conditions with observed failures. This enables semiconductor manufacturers to pinpoint the underlying factors contributing to failures and take preventive measures to address them. 

• Predictive Maintenance: ML algorithms can predict equipment failures or degradation based on historical data from semiconductor manufacturing equipment. By analyzing patterns in sensor data and equipment performance metrics, predictive maintenance models can help schedule maintenance activities proactively, minimizing downtime and optimizing production efficiency. 

• Quality Control: ML models can aid in real-time quality control by continuously monitoring manufacturing processes and identifying deviations from the desired specifications. This allows for rapid intervention to prevent defective products from being produced and ensures consistent product quality. 

• Anomaly Detection: ML techniques such as anomaly detection can help identify unexpected deviations or outliers in semiconductor manufacturing processes or device behavior, which may indicate potential failures or defects. This enables proactive intervention to prevent issues from escalating and affecting product quality. 

Machine learning for failure analysis in the semiconductor industry can involve techniques such as dimensionality reduction, clustering, and yield signature analysis to effectively identify and address potential failures. Here's how these techniques can be applied: 

• Dimensionality Reduction: In semiconductor manufacturing, datasets often contain a large number of variables or features, making analysis complex and computationally intensive. Dimensionality reduction techniques, such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) or t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE), can be used to reduce the number of dimensions while preserving essential information. By reducing the dimensionality of the data, it becomes easier to visualize and interpret, which is crucial for identifying patterns and anomalies associated with failures. 

• Clustering: Clustering algorithms, such as k-means clustering or hierarchical clustering, can group similar data points together based on their characteristics. In failure analysis, clustering can be used to identify distinct groups or clusters of semiconductor devices exhibiting similar failure patterns or behaviors. This can help in categorizing failures and prioritizing candidates for further analysis. 

• Yield Signature Analysis: Yield signature analysis involves examining the yield data collected during semiconductor manufacturing processes to identify characteristic patterns associated with failures or defects. Machine learning algorithms can analyze yield signatures to detect anomalies, trends, or correlations that may indicate potential failure modes. By comparing current yield signatures with historical data, it's possible to identify deviations and anomalies that warrant further investigation. 

• Feature Engineering: Feature engineering involves selecting, transforming, or creating new features from the raw data to improve the performance of machine learning models. In failure analysis, domain knowledge plays a crucial role in identifying relevant features that capture the underlying causes of failures. Engineers may extract features related to process parameters, device characteristics, environmental conditions, or test results to enhance the predictive power of machine learning models. 

• Supervised Learning: In supervised learning approaches, machine learning models are trained on labeled data, where each sample is associated with a specific outcome or class (e.g., failure/non-failure). Supervised learning techniques, such as classification or regression, can be used to predict failure probabilities or classify semiconductor devices based on their likelihood of failure. These models can assist in identifying candidates for failure analysis and prioritizing resources accordingly. 

• Unsupervised Learning: Unsupervised learning techniques, such as anomaly detection or density estimation, can identify unusual or unexpected patterns in the data without the need for labeled examples. Unsupervised learning can be particularly useful for detecting rare or novel failure modes that may not be explicitly defined in the training data. Anomaly detection algorithms can flag outliers or abnormalities in the data, which can then be investigated further to understand the underlying causes of failures. 

In ML for failure analysis, the analysis pipeline normally begins with wafer-level feature data instead of die-level spatial pattern data for low-yielding material in the semiconductor industry, which can be advantageous for several reasons: 

• Reduced Data Complexity: Wafer-level feature data typically involve aggregated statistics or metrics calculated from the entire wafer, which can significantly reduce the complexity of the data compared to analyzing individual die-level spatial patterns. This reduction in complexity can make it easier to identify overarching trends or patterns associated with low-yielding material. 

• Higher Signal-to-Noise Ratio: By aggregating data at the wafer level, the signal-to-noise ratio may be increased. This means that the relevant patterns or features associated with low yield are more prominent and easier to detect amidst the noise inherent in semiconductor manufacturing processes. 

• Efficiency in Initial Screening: Analyzing wafer-level data allows for a quicker initial screening of potential issues across a larger number of wafers. This can help prioritize further investigation efforts and resources on wafers showing anomalies or low yields, rather than conducting exhaustive analyses on individual die-level patterns from the outset. 

• Identification of Systemic Issues: Wafer-level data can provide insights into systemic issues affecting the manufacturing process, such as variations in equipment performance, material quality, or environmental factors. Identifying and addressing these systemic issues can lead to more significant improvements in yield and overall manufacturing efficiency. 

• Compatibility with Manufacturing Practices: In many semiconductor manufacturing facilities, wafer-level data are more readily available and routinely collected as part of quality control processes. Leveraging existing wafer-level data for failure analysis can streamline the analysis pipeline and integrate seamlessly into existing manufacturing practices. 

By starting the analysis pipeline with wafer-level feature data, analysts can efficiently identify and prioritize areas for further investigation, leading to more effective troubleshooting and improvement strategies in semiconductor manufacturing processes.

One example is that Torre et al. [1] had employed the analysis pipeline flowchart in Figure 3473a to failure analysis.  In practice, the number of initial features provided is typically several hundred. The workflow contains two sequential dimensionality reduction steps, namely, Principal Components Analysis (PCA), which greatly reduces the dimensionality of the data from hundreds of features down to a few dozen, and UMAP, whichreduces the feature space to three dimensions. And then, an unsupervised clustering algorithm is applied to cluster the wafers. Finally, some wafers had been identified for PFA analysis. 

Table 3473. Other applications of ML in semiconductor industry.

============================================

[1] James De La Torre, Don Kent, David Pivin, Eric St Pierre, Dimensionality Reduction and Clustering by Yield Signatures to Identify Candidates for Failure Analysis, ISTFA 2023: Proceedings of the 49th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis Conference November 12—16, 2023, Phoenix, Arizona, USA https://doi.org/10.31339/asm.cp.istfa2023p0001.